The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) has uncovered patterns of alleged price manipulation by some domestic airlines during the last festive season, citing interim findings that also flagged document irregularities over the Christmas period. The Commission added that its probe will next extend to foreign carriers operating in the country.
In a statement signed by the Director of Corporate Affairs, Ondaje Ijagwu, the Commission said the revelations were contained in an interim report issued by its Department of Surveillance and Investigations.
The report followed the announcement of an industry-wide investigation in January. According to the Commission, the probe included a forensic review supported by data collated from airlines operating domestic routes across Nigeria.
The FCCPC said further updates would be provided as the investigation progresses, particularly as scrutiny shifts to foreign airlines.
“The report compares domestic airline pricing from the December 2025 festive period with post-peak January 2026 fare levels. Preliminary analysis indicates that fares recorded during the December peak were materially higher than those observed in the post-peak period across several routes despite relative stability in critical operating variables like fuel price, government taxes and foreign exchange.
“The differences observed in fares therefore appear to reflect airlines’ arbitrary pricing decisions, including yield management and capacity allocation, rather than any variation in regulatory fees.
Route-level analysis shows that higher fares coincided with periods of reduced seat availability during predictable seasonal demand peaks.
“On some high density routes, peak fares were clustered within relatively narrow ranges across several operators. For instance, on certain corridors like Abuja-Port Harcourt, peak fares were several times higher than corresponding post-peak levels. On selected routes, the difference in the price of a single ticket reached approximately ₦405,000. Median fares across the sampled routes also rose markedly during the festive window when compared with post-peak benchmarks”.
“However, the interim report recognises that seasonal demand pressures, scheduling constraints and fleet utilisation may also affect pricing during peak travel periods. These factors remain under consideration as part of the Commission’s ongoing review.
READ ALSO: FAAN bans cash transactions at airports, goes digital February 28
Speaking on the release of the interim report, the Executive Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the FCCPC, Mr. Tunji Bello, said the review is part of the Commission’s statutory responsibility to promote competitive markets and safeguard consumers.
“This assessment is intended to provide clarity on pricing behaviour during predictable peak travel periods. The Commission’s role is not to disrupt legitimate commercial activity, and to ensure that market outcomes remain consistent with competition and consumer protection principles under the law, the Commission is conducting further structural and route-level analysis before reaching any conclusions.
Bello noted, “It is important to emphasise that this is an interim report. Our next action will be dictated by full facts established at the end of the review exercise. Then, the Commission will decide whether any regulatory guidance, engagement or enforcement steps are necessary and strictly in accordance with the law,” he said.
The report identifies the possible relevance of Sections 59, 72, 107, 108, 124 and 127 of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act 2018, which respectively address the prohibition of agreements in restraint of competition, the prohibition of abuse of a dominant position, the offence of price-fixing, conspiracy to commit offences under the Act, the right to fair dealings, and the prohibition of unfair, unreasonable or unjust contract terms.
Meanwhile, Mr. Bello announced that foreign airlines will come under FCCPC radar after the ongoing review of local airlines in view of widespread complaints of exploitative fares they allegedly charge Nigerians on certain routes compared to fares in neighbouring countries that are of equal distance.